<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bloggers on patrol</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourhtmlsource.com/phdblog/2007/04/09/bloggers-on-patrol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourhtmlsource.com/phdblog/2007/04/09/bloggers-on-patrol/</link>
	<description>Researchin' the day away...</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.yourhtmlsource.com/phdblog/2007/04/09/bloggers-on-patrol/#comment-5674</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 05:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourhtmlsource.com/phdblog/2007/04/09/bloggers-on-patrol/#comment-5674</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link, I re-read that old interview of mine for the first time in years.

Re: broken windows, you should read some of the criticisms of the original theory on Wikipedia: &lt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fixing_Broken_Windows&gt;

I stand behind the rest of what I said in that interview, though.  And I still believe that Sam's specific implementation of striking through flamebait solves a real problem in an interesting way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link, I re-read that old interview of mine for the first time in years.</p>
<p>Re: broken windows, you should read some of the criticisms of the original theory on Wikipedia: <http ://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fixing_Broken_Windows></p>
<p>I stand behind the rest of what I said in that interview, though.  And I still believe that Sam&#8217;s specific implementation of striking through flamebait solves a real problem in an interesting way.</http></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
